What did I have to lose? So I took the quiz, just for fun. Not one of those Facebook quizzes to
see if you can spell (I’m a crackerjack speller, but then, I’ve known that
since forever, especially since Grade 11 when my English Composition teacher
said he would give a quarter to any student who could spell acquiesce, but then defaulted after I
spelled it correctly, an action that still seems to retain some angst), or to find
out what your hemispheric dominance is, or what your last name might be in
another life, how much history or literature you might know, or what historical
character you most resemble.
This quiz wore legitimacy. Sponsored by the New York Times, no less, the two-part Gail Collins quiz purported
to assess what a person knew about the first 100 days of the Trump presidency. On Part I, I scored 15 / 16. I missed the question on the Ben Carson "listening tour":
Secretary
of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson embarked on a “listening tour”
around the country. A high point
came in Miami, where Carson …
1. Took
a week off to go to the beach.
2. Got
stuck in a housing project elevator.
3. Kept
pointing out that he never claimed to know anything about the federal
government.
I chose three. Wrong. He got
stuck in a housing project elevator.
Oh, the ignominities of political life.
The tally came with a comment: You
may be thinking too much about this.
(By the way, I scored 16 /
17 on part 2 of the same quiz. The
comment there was, You know more than he
does. Well, that doesn’t take
much, does it? The bar is so low,
it’s an insult.)
Seriously? Of course I’m thinking too much about this. To help the cause of journalism,
pivotal in these dark times, I’ve subscribed to the Globe and Mail (Toronto), the New
York Times, and the Washington Post. I read Truthdig and Mother Jones. I even gobble reports on the French
election. Le Pen, I know something
about; Macron is a newbie, so I learn what I can about him, and update my
knowledge of his rival. Is the
Macron victory a glimmer of hope?
Now, days after the Comey dismissal, I
still can’t understand how anyone can be played to the degree Trump continues
to play his supporters. I can’t
understand how almost all of the Republican Congress can lie, shove all but the
wealthiest Americans under the bus, and then self-congratulate. How can this happen?
I have always believed that the lessons of autocracy,
that insidious dissembler in its rise and in its consequences, had been learned
after World War II, that the spilled blood of heroes had been shed to preserve
a way of life and to teach enduring lessons. How can a governing party be so cavalier in its dismissal of their sacrifice?
Maybe they are busy ignoring. As Margaret Atwood says in The Handmaid’s Tale, "Ignoring isn't the same as ignorance, you have to work at it." (66) As she recalls fond memories associated
with hotel rooms of her past life, Offred, the heroine of that prescient work, realizes that she "wasted them, those rooms, that freedom from being seen . . .
Careless. I was careless, in those
rooms." (60 – 61). You
don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s gone, in other words. She didn’t realize what a treasure her
former life was until everything changed. As the society around her was being transformed,
she didn’t pay attention. She "lived in the blank white spaces at the edges of print, . . . in the gaps
between the stories." (67) The
events didn’t concern her in particular, so why be concerned? She learned, though, that one command
can deliver the coup the grâce to a privileged way of life whose underpinnings
have become brittle.
So, let’s not be careless with our privileged life, with truth,
facts, and democracy itself. Let’s
not live in the gaps between the stories.
We have to know too much, no matter how stressful that might be. We are strong. We
can manage the stress. We have the
inner grit to live with awareness and to act. Atwood’s
advice, back in 1985, is appropriate today: “Nolite te bastardescarborundorum. Don't let the bastards grind you down.”
No comments:
Post a Comment