The doorbell rings at my daughter’s, one morning the week of
her wedding. I answer the door
because I am nearest the door, it’s the week before a wedding, and no one
stands on ceremony. Two women with
pamphlets in their hands greet me, one on the step and one on the sidewalk just
below her. I can tell right
away why they are here, and, I
know that, in about ten seconds, I will need to decide whether I will answer
their question or send them away.
I open my mouth and take a breath to send them away when I hear the
question.
“Has science replaced the Bible? What can we do about science questioning the existence of
God?”
That’s when I pause for second, and seize the opportunity to
climb on my favorite soapbox.
”I’ve always seen science as a revelation of God,” I
respond. ”In my view, God has
endowed humanity with the gifts that have produced the discoveries and
inventions of science. Look at how science has improved our
life over the centuries, in
health, communication, and transportation, just for starters. Why should God not work through scientists and other people to
make His Kingdom come?”
The challenges that science has presented Christianity
through the ages (see Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, reproductive technologies, for example)
persist in our own (see Darwin, reproductive technologies). I write in the Christian context
because that’s what I know,
although I suspect that generalization to religion might not be out of
line. Why is it that Christianity
interprets advancement through science in our time as such a threat? Can religion not hold its own? For religion to tout human progress
through science in our time as indicators of the ongoing revelation of God, though, it would first have to admit
that divine revelation continues through
people, exceptional and ordinary, well-known and obscure, embodied through
Jesus two thousand and more years ago, and the prophets centuries more before
that. It would have to curb a longing for the thought
processes and standards of the Middle Ages and undo any moves already initiated
in that direction. It would have
to stop perceiving revelation as having stopped centuries ago. For me, that’s not such a leap. It seems perfectly natural.
Can scientific discoveries can have unforeseen and unwanted
negative consequences? Of
course. Examples abound: nuclear energy, the internal combustion engine, the
technologies that support social media, pesticides, genetic engineering, to
name only a few. Still, the nefarious
effects don’t negate the benefits those same discoveries have brought the human
race over time. The arrival of the
internal combustion engine, for example, a contributor to greenhouse gases in
our age, was perceived as a salvation by early twentieth century cities
wondering what to do about the serious problem of disposal of accumulated horse
manure (see Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner in SuperFreakonomics:
Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life
Insurance). Genetic engineering created wheat
strains adapted to the rigors and growing season of the Canadian prairies. Benefits and challenges go hand in
hand.
Art, it seems, hasn’t suffered the same stigma as religion. Although art, long perceived as a revelation of God (see for example, Bernini, Michaelangelo, da Vinci, Milton, Dante, Bach, Mozart, Handel), has challenged religious
beliefs and practices as well (see The
Last Temptation of Christ, Charlie Hebdo, The Simpsons, South Park,
Da Vinci Code), individuals still
look to song, music, and visual art to express their sense of God or to
discover it. Why, then, stigmatize
science?
It’s time for us to see God revealed in scientific
expressions through the ages and in modern times as much as in artistic
expressions. After all, scientific
and artistic discoveries and creations are possible because of the gift with
which God endowed the human person, created, as Christians believe, in His own
image. Then, we can say with the lady at the bottom
of the steps at my daughter’s that day, “I hadn’t look at it like that
before,” and we can rejoice and be
grateful for accomplishment of all
kinds in our own time.
Should you be among people who love mobile home retirement parks and plan excitedly to retire and purchase in one, a word of caution.
ReplyDeleteThings won't be as safe as it appears. Find out exactly what amenities that is going to be provided. Be cautious to read the contract carefully.
For more please visit retirement park in Massachusett