by Jack Riemer of the Houston Chronicle, February 10, 2001
On Nov. 18,
1995, Itzhak Perlman, the violinist, came
on stage to give a concert at Avery
Fisher Hall at Lincoln
Center in New York City. If you have ever been to
a
Perlman concert, you know that getting on stage is no
small achievement for
him. He was stricken with polio
as a child, and so he has braces on both legs
and walks
with the aid of two crutches.
To see him walk across the stage one
step at a time,
painfully and slowly, is an awesome sight. He walks
painfully,
yet majestically, until he reaches his chair.
Then he sits down, slowly, puts
his crutches on the floor,
undoes the clasps on his legs, tucks one foot back, and
extends the other foot forward. Then he bends down and picks up the violin,
puts it under his chin, nods to the
conductor, and proceeds to play.
By now, the
audience is used to this ritual. They sit quietly
while he makes his way
across the stage to his chair. They
remain reverently silent while he undoes
the clasps on his
legs. They wait until he is ready to play. But this time,
something
went wrong.
Just as he finished the first few bars, one of the strings
on his
violin broke. You could hear it snap--it went off like gunfire across the
room. There was no mistaking what
that sound meant. There was no mistaking
what he had to do.
People who were there that night thought to
themselves:
"We figured that he would have to get up, put on the clasps
again, pick up the crutches and limp his way off stage
to either find another
violin or else find another string
for this one."
But he didn't.
Instead, he waited a moment, closed his eyes and then signaled the conductor to
begin again. The
orchestra began, and he played from where he had left off.
And he played with such passion and such power and such
purity as they had
never heard before.
Of course, anyone knows that it is impossible to play
a
symphonic work with just three strings. I know that, and
you know that, but
that night Itzhak Perlman refused to
know that. You could see him modulating,
changing, re-composing the piece in his head. At one point, it sounded like he
was de-tuning the strings to get new sounds from
them that they had never made
before.
When he finished, there was an awesome silence in the
room. And then
people rose and cheered. There was an
extraordinary outburst of applause from
every corner of the auditorium. We were all on our feet, screaming and
cheering, doing everything we could to show how much
we appreciated what he had
done.
He smiled,
wiped the sweat from this brow, raised his bow to quiet us, and then he said,
not boastfully, but in a
quiet, pensive, reverent tone, "You know,
sometimes it
is the artist's task to find out how much music you can
still make
with what you have left."
What a powerful line that is. It has stayed in
my mind
ever since I heard it. And who knows? Perhaps that is
the definition of
life—not just for artists but for
all of us. Here is a man who has prepared all his life
to make music on a
violin of four strings, who, all of
a sudden, in the middle of a concert, finds
himself with
only three strings; so he makes music with three strings,
and the
music he made that night with just three strings
was more beautiful, more
sacred, more memorable, than
any that he had ever made before, when he had four
strings.
So, perhaps our task in this shaky, fast-changing,
bewildering world
in which we live is to make music, at
first with all that we have, and then,
when that is no
longer possible, to make music with what we have left.
No comments:
Post a Comment