The album in my mind still houses the photo
of my Grade 5 classroom on the second floor of the convent where I went to
primary school. That photograph
has not bleached or frayed with time.
There aren’t any cracks in it, either, and the colour is still vibrant. Why would the memory remain so vivid
fifty years later?
For one thing, that classroom had a
cloakroom at the front of the room, to the right of the teacher’s desk as she
faced the class. Students
fortunate enough to spend a year in that classroom had status. They could store their coats, boots,
and other paraphernalia in an enclosed space with glass doors leading out to
the classroom. Panels of windows
opened up an entire wall of the cloackroom, and extended along the wall of the
classroom. Daydreamers had
an unobstructed view of the convent gardens and the parish church just across
the road. As a result, that room mitigated
the drudgery and tedium of Grade 5.
It was in that room, as well, that I
decided to become a teacher.
During the class study of
the countries of South America and their capitals, I noticed that our
textbook cited Rio de Janiero as the capital of Brazil. I knew that was false. National
Geographic had featured an article on the new Brazilian capital, called Brasilia. “I’ll bring the magazine tomorrow,” I assured a skeptical teacher. So I did. I couldn’t wait to get to school, and during the Social
Studies work period, I walked up to the teacher’s desk, magazine in hand. My
teacher looked up, smiled, and glanced at the magazine. Then, she turned back to her reading of
the National Enquirer. What? My teacher was more interested in gossip than in the new
capital of Brazil? How could that
happen? In my mind, a teacher was
supposed to support curiosity and learning. I resolved to do better than that. When my turn came, I would affirm students who took the time
to teach me things. I would welcome
the Brasilias that came my way. Disillusioned, I returned to my
desk. Something in me died that day.
I was at that desk right in the middle of
the middle row of desks, aligned with the teacher’s desk and the clock above it
on November 22, 1963, when the principal came on the intercom and announced
that John F. Kennedy had been shot.
Thanks to my father’s news addiction, I already knew a lot about
Kennedy. My ten-year-old mind
wondered how a politician, especially the president of a country, could be so
young. Before Kennedy had been
Eisenhower, and we in Canada had Diefenbaker and Pearson. What a revelation—politicians
didn't have to be old. They could have
beautiful wives, and small children running around the White House and peeking
out from under their famous father’s desk. I had already read a few books on the Kennedys that had come
through my parents’ book club. I
felt I knew the family. When JFK’s
death was announced, I felt I had lost a member of my family.
In shock, I endured the afternoon and the
bus ride home. My parents already
had the television turned on. I
spent the weekend glued to it, engraving forever the images of Lyndon Johndon’s
oath of office aboard Air Force 1, with Jackie Kennedy at this side, the murder
of Lee Harvey Oswald, the cortège along Pennsylvania Avenue, the riderless
horse improperly shod, a veiled and sombre Jackie Kennedy holding her
children’s hands, and, of course, John-John’s salute. My bereavement took an odd turn, and became an obsession
with anything Kennedy. I read Death of a President, by William
Manchester, Robert Kennedy and His Times
by Arthur Schlesinger Jr., books on the family, William Garrison’s On the Trail of the Assassins (later
adapted for the screen by Oliver Stone), even Steven King’s fictional 11/22/63. Anything about the Kennedys snared my attention..
When we first visited family in Dallas in 2008, I only
had one reply to the question, “What do you want to do while you’re here?” See Dealey Plaza and the Book
Depository Building. So we did. I felt that I was visiting a shrine, a
sacred place, like the cathedral in the war cemetery in Verdun. Both times we were there, I stood on
the X in the street marking the spot of the assassination, and strolled on the
grassy knoll, trying to visualize the circumstances. Both times we visited the site, other people were milling
about like me, as well, interacting with their own memories and images of that
fateful today.
Whatever JFK’s personal weaknesses and
transgressions, well-documented in the fifty years since his murder, I still
associate with his memory a sense of possibility, that things others only dream
of (as his brother Robert said later) could come to pass under his
administration. That same aura of
change and idealism surrounded Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy, both killed in
1968. I remember watching RFK
bleeding out on the floor of the Ambassador hotel in Los Angeles before leaving
for school on the morning of June 5, 1968. I walked, disconsolate, around the school yard during
recess all that day, hoping against hope that he would survive, wondering how
such horrors could happen. Robert
Kennedy died the next day.
I felt the same sense of loss in 1978 at
the death of Pope John Paul I.
Once again, so much hope shattered. Two years ago, in August of 2011, as I was driving
into Regina for a shopping trip, I heard that Jack Layton had passed away. The clerk at the framing counter
at Michael’s was similarly subdued and preoccupied. What would Canada do without him? Who would have the charisma and the eloquence to speak up
for the working class? I was compelled to sign
the guest book and send a message of condolence. Once again, I felt a personal loss.
So this morning on “Q”, during his hommage to the JFK
anniversary, as Jian Ghomeshi indicated that fewer and fewer people can answer
the question, “Where were you when JFK was assassinated?“, including his entire
production team, I thought, “Well, I can.” Like the filaments of the body’s lymph system, a political event that occurs when
you’re ten years old can imprint on you.
It can colour feelings and visceral reactions in analogous events throughout a lifetime. In my case, forever connected to a desk
in a Grade 5 classroom, it has precipitated a veritable holodeck of bereavement
memories.
Thanks Yvette - I suspect most Catholics of our generation (and our parents') remember November 22, 1963. The election of JFK represented the acceptance of Roman Catholics into mainstream America, and by extension, mainstream Canada.
ReplyDeleteParishes and families embrace Camelot, with all the hope and endless possibilities he and his family represented. If we children did not fully understand, we certainly were swept up by the enthusiasm and joy of family, school and parish.
I still see raw emotion on the faces of the nuns, lay teachers and priests at our school as the news was announced. Most were simply shattered by their grief.
Until that day I'm certain I did not know emotional response could be shared so strongly, by so many people.
Yes, Lou, you describe a critical aspect of the fascination with the Kennedys in North America and worldwide. Kennedy was also president at the beginning of the media age, which helped people connect with world figures more closely than they ever could before. Thanks for providing that perspective.
ReplyDelete